Updated Winter Distribution Outlook
With the final days (thankfully) of 2008 coming to a close, I thought I would provide investors an updated outlook on Energy Trust Distributions for this upcoming winter. The outlook is intended as a guide for announced distributions through to the end of winter, as predicting distributions beyond more than one quarter would prove folly in such turbulent times. Only a few trusts declare distributions for more than one month at a time and of course, one, Canadian Oil Sands Trust, pays quarterly.
The final few trading sessions will provide investors plenty to think about regarding should one view a particular trust investment as yet another tax-loss selling opportunity, or as a high-yielding keeper, for times good and bad. Not surprisingly, the outlook for many trusts is for lower monthly distributions and since I issued my initial Winter Distribution Outlook six weeks ago, forecasts for payouts are even lower, given ever-tumbling energy prices. However, one could easily argue that the market has already priced this in, given the
average distribution yield of the coverage group is 21.7%.On a positive note, two Energy Trusts likely will not have to cut distributions at all (Daylight and Vermilion) and it is possible Peyto and Paramount may keep distributions at fall 2007 levels as well. Unfortunately, buying a basket of trusts and letting the cash register ring, simply won’t work in this environment. A few trusts are approaching a crossroads, where their viability and potentially, solvency, could be called into question in the not too distant future, should commodity prices stay near current levels. Even more damaging would be if market perception were to be that $25 oil is right around the corner. This fate has befallen a number of trusts since Flaherty’s Halloween massacre, but so far victims have generally been smaller trusts. This time around could look very different.
One caveat with distribution projections is that one needs to consider that most Trusts have a series of options, including selling off assets, joint ventures, reducing Capex, closing out in the money hedges and such actions could easily alter my outlook.
Distribution Chart
Currently, the financially weakest of the 15 trusts in the coverage universe appears to be Advantage. Historically, payouts have been far too high and cash flows cannot support and payout anywhere near current levels of 12 cents/month would damage an already overleveraged balance sheet. Should the trust remain in its current form and using current energy pricing, a monthly distribution of 2 to 4 cents appears likely.
A handful of trusts appear susceptible to large distribution cuts as well. Canadian Oil Sands Trust, Pengrowth and Penn West are likely candidates to cut distributions one third or more. In the case of COS, the trust’s recent 2009 forecast calls for distributions to remain high to effectively overpay distributions before the 2011 deadline for trust taxability. Unfortunately, the Trust’s assumptions call for WTI to average US $75 in 2009, so it is not hard to see where the Trust may have difficult decisions to make before winter comes to a close.
Pengrowth and Penn West both have significant debt levels and flat to negative drill bit growth. Further, Penn West appears to have far too many exploration-oriented projects to be paying such a high monthly payout, in the current financial climate.
Two trusts that are quite difficult to accurately predict future payouts are Harvest, due to its large asset concentration in refining and Provident, due to its midstream businesses. Both Trusts present an interesting risk/reward scenario. Trusts that appear best positioned to weather the financial storm are Enerplus, ARC, Daylight and Vermilion.
Enerplus has an excellent diversity of assets, ranging from Oil Sands to Bakken Oil to conventional production and a well managed balance sheet. As one of the larger trusts, it also is in a much stronger position than peers such as Penn West or Pengrowth to consolidate the sector, through accretive transactions.
ARC surprised me by slashing its distribution from 24 to 15 cents, but appears to have got its payout down to a manageable level for current energy pricing.
Daylight is a smaller trust that has completed a string of moves that have really strengthened the company’s balance sheet. The company also has excellent hedges in place.
Vermilion has never cut distributions, due to very conservative management. Coupled with an international asset base and large stake in Verenex, which is currently on the block, a distribution at the current level remains likely for the foreseeable future.